OR perhaps just incredibly insensitive. I'll vote for both.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/ap_en_mo/simpson_interview_14
He is going to discuss, hypothetically, how he would have done it, if he'd done it, but he claims that he didn't do it.
Is the man broke? Is that why he would stoop so low? For God's sake, he's got two children with one of the victims in question…how could he possibly write such a book or especially have an unrestricted interview on this topic?
This smells like a man who's incredibly satisfied that he got away with murder and is just itching to tell the world about it so he can be admired for it.
He looks guiltier than ever.
No comments:
Post a Comment